<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Legal News Headlines by Lawyers.com</title><description>Published articles, messages, chats about current legal news</description><link>http://www.lawyers.com</link><item><title>Woman can sue over YouTube clip de-posting;  Judge rules Web host must factor whether copyrighted excerpt was too small to matter
</title><link>http://research.lawyers.com/news-headline/Woman-can-sue-over-YouTube-clip-de-posting--Judge-rules-Web-host-must-factor-whether-copyrighted-excerpt-was-too-small-to-matter-l:839972752.html?method=rss</link><description> In a victory for small-time music copiers over the entertainment industry, a federal judge ruled Wednesday that copyright holders can't order one of their songs removed from the Web without first checking to see if the excerpt was so small and innocuous that it was legal.
</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:00:00 -0400
</pubDate></item><item><title>State laws do not extend to EBay
</title><link>http://research.lawyers.com/news-headline/State-laws-do-not-extend-to-EBay-l:840141874.html?method=rss</link><description> California consumers are not protected by the state's consumer protection laws when something they buy on EBay turns out to be less than advertised, a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday.
</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:00:00 -0400
</pubDate></item><item><title>BROTHERS WILL GIVE UP CASH AND CARS TO SETTLE FTC CHARGES THAT EARNINGS CLAIMS FOR THEIR MONEY-MAKING SECRETS MISLED CONSUMERS
</title><link>http://research.lawyers.com/news-headline/BROTHERS-WILL-GIVE-UP-CASH-AND-CARS-TO-SETTLE-FTC-CHARGES-THAT-EARNINGS-CLAIMS-FOR-THEIR-MONEY-MAKING-SECRETS-MISLED-CONSUMERS-l:839973601.html?method=rss</link><description> The following information was released by the Federal Trade Commission: Two brothers have agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that they misled consumers with false earnings claims for work-at-home schemes involving free government grants, mystery shopping, online surveys, and data entry. Under the proposed settlement, they are banned from marketing work-at-home opportunities in the future. The defendants are charged with making false and unsubstantiated earnings claims in violation of the FTC Act. According to the FTCs complaint, they charged consumers from $47 to $129 to access their members only Web sites with their money-making secrets. Their advertised programs either did not exist as represented or did not offer quick and easy money with little time or effort as promised.
</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:00:00 -0400
</pubDate></item></channel></rss>